hexhub-deb
The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from oss.hexhub.cn, which is the vendor's own CDN/object-storage host for hexhub.cn. This is a common pattern for proprietary or closed-source tools distributing via AUR. The sha256sum is present and pinned, which mitigates substitution risk somewhat. However, the binary is a closed-source executable from a personal/small-vendor host with no reproducibility, no source build, and the host (oss.hexhub.cn) is not a widely audited distribution channel. The package installs an executed binary (a database/SSH/Docker management tool) directly from this host. This is a genuine medium supply-chain concern: if the host is compromised or the maintainer pushes a new pkgver without updating the checksum, arbitrary code could be executed. The cheaper model's MEDIUM rating is correct here — not a false positive, but also not evidence of active malice.
Triggered rules
source_untrusted_domain
One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).
-
PKGBUILD:12
source=("${pkgname}_${pkgver}_amd64.deb::https://oss.hexhub.cn/plugin/HexHub-amd64-deb-${pkgver}.deb")
llm_review
An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 72%): The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from oss.hexhub.cn, which is the vendor's own CDN/object-storage host for hexhub.cn. This is a common pattern for proprietary or closed-source tools distributing via AUR. The sha256sum is present and pinned, which mitigates substitution risk somewhat. However, the binary is a closed-source executable from a personal/small-vendor host with no reproducibility, no source build, and the host (oss.hexhub.cn) is not a widely audited distribution channel. The package installs an executed binary (a database/SSH/Docker management tool) directly from this host. This is a genuine medium supply-chain concern: if the host is compromised or the maintainer pushes a new pkgver without updating the checksum, arbitrary code could be executed. The cheaper model's MEDIUM rating is correct here — not a false positive, but also not evidence of active malice.
PKGBUILD
1 offending line(s) highlighted# Maintainer: mineleng <15119587808@163.com>
pkgname=hexhub-deb
pkgver=1.3.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="HexHub"
arch=('x86_64')
url="https://hexhub.cn"
license=('GPL')
depends=()
pkgdesc="database, docker, ssh, sftp. all in one"
provides=('HexHub')
source=("${pkgname}_${pkgver}_amd64.deb::https://oss.hexhub.cn/plugin/HexHub-amd64-deb-${pkgver}.deb")
sha256sums=('a616a4e489feb7bea65e10feca1f0d569568de92442abfffcb1885a44190eb79')
package() {
# 解压 DEB 包中的 data 部分
bsdtar -xf "${srcdir}/${pkgname}_${pkgver}_amd64.deb" -C "${pkgdir}" data.tar.xz
bsdtar -xf "${srcdir}/data.tar.xz" -C "${pkgdir}"
rm -f "${pkgdir}/data.tar.xz"
}
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 00:27:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-16 00:03:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-15 00:25:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-14 00:27:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-13 00:19:54 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-12 00:25:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-11 00:19:22 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-10 00:22:44 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-09 00:04:09 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-08 00:18:08 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-07 00:30:15 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-06 00:17:06 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-05 00:16:27 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-04 00:03:13 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-03 00:15:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-02 00:02:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-01 00:11:19 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-31 00:19:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-30 00:04:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-29 00:29:17 | Medium | 2 |