libps5000

MEDIUM
maintainer mti 0 votes scanned 2026-09-17 00:27:14.276658
View on AUR
Why flagged

The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary Debian package (.deb) from labs.picotech.com, which is PicoTech's own official Linux software repository (they publish their Linux drivers/libraries there). The host is not a random personal server — it is the vendor's official Linux package distribution subdomain. However, the package installs a prebuilt closed-source binary library directly from a vendor subdomain without GPG/signature verification (only an MD5 checksum, which is weak), and the package() function extracts and installs the binary without any integrity chain beyond that MD5. This is a real but modest supply-chain concern: if labs.picotech.com were compromised or the file silently replaced, the MD5 would need to be updated to detect it. The use of a vendor subdomain rather than a personal host reduces the risk compared to a truly unofficial source, but the lack of strong cryptographic verification of an executed binary keeps this at medium rather than clean.

Triggered rules

Medium source=() URL on a non-standard host source_untrusted_domain

One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).

  • PKGBUILD:19 source=("http://labs.picotech.com/debian/pool/main/libp/libps5000/${pkgname}_${pkgver//_/-}_amd64.deb")
Medium AI review llm_review

An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 72%): The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary Debian package (.deb) from labs.picotech.com, which is PicoTech's own official Linux software repository (they publish their Linux drivers/libraries there). The host is not a random personal server — it is the vendor's official Linux package distribution subdomain. However, the package installs a prebuilt closed-source binary library directly from a vendor subdomain without GPG/signature verification (only an MD5 checksum, which is weak), and the package() function extracts and installs the binary without any integrity chain beyond that MD5. This is a real but modest supply-chain concern: if labs.picotech.com were compromised or the file silently replaced, the MD5 would need to be updated to detect it. The use of a vendor subdomain rather than a personal host reduces the risk compared to a truly unofficial source, but the lack of strong cryptographic verification of an executed binary keeps this at medium rather than clean.

PKGBUILD

1 offending line(s) highlighted
1# Maintainer: Mikael Tillenius <mti at tillenius dot com>
2pkgname=libps5000
3pkgver=2.1.54_3r2438
4pkgrel=1
5pkgdesc="library for picotech oscilloscope 5000 series (5203, 5204)"
6arch=('x86_64')
7url="http://www.picotech.com/linux.html"
8license=('custom')
9groups=()
10depends=(libusb)
11optdepends=()
12provides=()
13conflicts=()
14replaces=()
15backup=()
16options=(!strip)
17install=
18changelog=
19source=("http://labs.picotech.com/debian/pool/main/libp/libps5000/${pkgname}_${pkgver//_/-}_amd64.deb")
20md5sums=('18c95a8bb1dec0753481974c84889b9b')
21
22package() {
23 tar -xf data.tar.xz -C "${pkgdir}"
24 chmod -R go-w $pkgdir
25 chown -R root:root $pkgdir
26}
27

Scan history

Scanned at (UTC)SeverityRules
2026-09-17 00:27:14 Medium 2
2026-09-16 00:03:17 Medium 2
2026-09-15 00:25:31 Medium 2
2026-09-14 00:27:57 Medium 2
2026-09-13 00:19:54 Medium 2
2026-09-12 00:25:17 Medium 2
2026-09-11 00:19:22 Medium 2
2026-09-10 00:22:44 Medium 2
2026-09-09 00:04:09 Medium 2
2026-09-08 00:18:08 Medium 2
2026-09-07 00:30:15 Medium 2
2026-09-06 00:17:06 Medium 2
2026-09-05 00:16:27 Medium 2
2026-09-04 00:03:13 Medium 2
2026-09-03 00:15:47 Medium 2
2026-09-02 00:02:31 Medium 2
2026-09-01 00:11:19 Medium 2
2026-08-31 00:19:57 Medium 2
2026-08-30 00:04:14 Medium 2
2026-08-29 00:29:17 Medium 2

Report a package

Reports go to the AURWatch maintainer (one person) and are read by hand. No login required.

0 / 4000
Your suggestion