lingma-bin

maintainer wildkid1024 · 1 votes · scanned 2026-08-03 00:08:14.047287

MEDIUM

Why flagged The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from an Aliyun OSS bucket (lingma-ide.oss-rg-china-mainland.aliyuncs.com) which is plausibly the official vendor host for Alibaba's Lingma IDE product (lingma.aliyun.com is the official URL). However, two real concerns remain: (1) the source URL points to a 'latest' rolling artifact rather than a versioned/pinned release, meaning the downloaded binary can change at any time without the PKGBUILD being updated; (2) sha256sums is set to 'SKIP', so there is zero integrity verification of the downloaded executable. Together these mean any compromise or silent replacement of the OSS-hosted binary would go undetected. The host itself is consistent with an official Alibaba/Aliyun product distribution channel, so this is not clearly malicious, but the combination of an executed binary + no checksum + mutable 'latest' URL constitutes a genuine supply-chain risk warranting a medium rating.

Triggered rules

MEDIUM source=() URL on a non-standard host source_untrusted_domain

One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).

PKGBUILD:15 source=("lingma_${pkgver}_amd64.deb::https://lingma-ide.oss-rg-china-mainland.aliyuncs.com/release/latest/lingma_amd64.deb")

MEDIUM AI review llm_review

An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 82%): The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from an Aliyun OSS bucket (lingma-ide.oss-rg-china-mainland.aliyuncs.com) which is plausibly the official vendor host for Alibaba's Lingma IDE product (lingma.aliyun.com is the official URL). However, two real concerns remain: (1) the source URL points to a 'latest' rolling artifact rather than a versioned/pinned release, meaning the downloaded binary can change at any time without the PKGBUILD being updated; (2) sha256sums is set to 'SKIP', so there is zero integrity verification of the downloaded executable. Together these mean any compromise or silent replacement of the OSS-hosted binary would go undetected. The host itself is consistent with an official Alibaba/Aliyun product distribution channel, so this is not clearly malicious, but the combination of an executed binary + no checksum + mutable 'latest' URL constitutes a genuine supply-chain risk warranting a medium rating.

PKGBUILD

1 offending line(s) highlighted

      1# Maintainer: wildkid1024 <wildkid1024 at outlook dot com>
    
      2pkgname=lingma-bin
    
      3pkgver=0.11.0
    
      4pkgrel=4
    
      5pkgdesc="Lingma IDE 灵码编辑器 - Binary Version"
    
      6arch=('x86_64')
    
      7url="https://lingma.aliyun.com/"
    
      8license=('custom')
    
      9depends=('gtk3' 'nss' 'alsa-lib' 'libxss' 'libxtst' 'mesa')
    
      10provides=('lingma' 'lingma-ide')
    
      11conflicts=('lingma' 'lingma-ide')
    
      12options=(!strip)
    
      13
    
      14# 已替换为你提供的最新下载链接
    
      15source=("lingma_${pkgver}_amd64.deb::https://lingma-ide.oss-rg-china-mainland.aliyuncs.com/release/latest/lingma_amd64.deb")
    
      16
    
      17# 清空校验和（使用 latest 链接会自动更新文件，需要重新生成校验和）
    
      18sha256sums=('SKIP')
    
      19
    
      20package() {
    
      21    bsdtar -xOf "lingma_${pkgver}_amd64.deb" data.tar.xz | bsdtar -xJf - -C "${pkgdir}"
    
      22}
    
      23

Scan history

Scanned at (UTC)	Severity	Rules
2026-08-03 00:08:14	MEDIUM	2
2026-08-02 00:16:08	MEDIUM	2
2026-08-01 00:11:18	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-31 00:14:10	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-30 00:17:23	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-29 00:25:53	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-28 00:07:28	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-27 00:24:32	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-26 00:07:32	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-25 00:13:44	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-24 00:02:28	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-23 00:14:47	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-22 00:29:32	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-21 00:24:15	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-20 00:19:49	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-19 00:17:08	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-18 00:14:48	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-17 00:06:16	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-16 00:05:41	MEDIUM	2
2026-07-15 00:09:25	MEDIUM	2