musl-cross-bin
This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary cross-compiler toolchain (containing gcc, binutils, libc, and other executables) from more.musl.cc, which is a subdomain of the known musl.cc project that distributes prebuilt musl-based toolchains. While musl.cc is a legitimate and well-known resource in the Linux embedded/cross-compilation community, two concerns remain: (1) the checksum is set to 'SKIP', meaning there is zero integrity verification — any MITM or server-side substitution would go undetected; (2) the artifact is a prebuilt binary toolchain that gets installed to /opt/cross and will be executed by users, making integrity verification critical. The host itself (more.musl.cc) is not an official distribution channel like a distro mirror or a major forge, and the lack of any hash means the supply-chain risk is real and unmitigated. This is a genuine medium-severity concern: not clearly malicious, but an executed binary from a semi-official host with no checksum verification.
Triggered rules
source_untrusted_domain
One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).
-
PKGBUILD:13
source=("https://more.musl.cc/${pkgver}/x86_64-linux-musl/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz")
llm_review
An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 85%): This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary cross-compiler toolchain (containing gcc, binutils, libc, and other executables) from more.musl.cc, which is a subdomain of the known musl.cc project that distributes prebuilt musl-based toolchains. While musl.cc is a legitimate and well-known resource in the Linux embedded/cross-compilation community, two concerns remain: (1) the checksum is set to 'SKIP', meaning there is zero integrity verification — any MITM or server-side substitution would go undetected; (2) the artifact is a prebuilt binary toolchain that gets installed to /opt/cross and will be executed by users, making integrity verification critical. The host itself (more.musl.cc) is not an official distribution channel like a distro mirror or a major forge, and the lack of any hash means the supply-chain risk is real and unmitigated. This is a genuine medium-severity concern: not clearly malicious, but an executed binary from a semi-official host with no checksum verification.
PKGBUILD
1 offending line(s) highlighted# Maintainer: TheOddCell <rayfb.to.1@gmail.com>
pkgname=musl-cross-bin
pkgver=11.2.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Prebuilt musl cross compiler toolchain (x86_64-linux-musl) from musl.cc"
arch=('x86_64')
url="https://musl.cc"
license=('MIT')
makedepends=('coreutils' 'tar' 'gzip')
depends=()
provides=('musl-cross')
conflicts=()
source=("https://more.musl.cc/${pkgver}/x86_64-linux-musl/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz")
sha256sums=('SKIP')
package() {
install -dm755 "${pkgdir}/opt/cross/x86_64-linux-musl-cross"
tar -xzf "${srcdir}/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz" \
-C "${pkgdir}/opt/cross/"
}
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 00:27:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-16 00:03:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-15 00:25:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-14 00:27:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-13 00:19:54 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-12 00:25:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-11 00:19:22 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-10 00:22:44 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-09 00:04:09 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-08 00:18:08 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-07 00:30:15 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-06 00:17:06 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-05 00:16:27 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-04 00:03:13 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-03 00:15:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-02 00:02:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-01 00:11:19 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-31 00:19:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-30 00:04:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-29 00:29:17 | Medium | 2 |