musl-cross-bin
This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary cross-compiler toolchain (containing gcc, binutils, libc, and other executables) from more.musl.cc, which is a subdomain of the known musl.cc project that distributes prebuilt musl-based toolchains. While musl.cc is a legitimate and well-known resource in the Linux embedded/cross-compilation community, two concerns remain: (1) the checksum is set to 'SKIP', meaning there is zero integrity verification — any MITM or server-side substitution would go undetected; (2) the artifact is a prebuilt binary toolchain that gets installed to /opt/cross and will be executed by users, making integrity verification critical. The host itself (more.musl.cc) is not an official distribution channel like a distro mirror or a major forge, and the lack of any hash means the supply-chain risk is real and unmitigated. This is a genuine medium-severity concern: not clearly malicious, but an executed binary from a semi-official host with no checksum verification.
Triggered rules
source_untrusted_domain
One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).
-
PKGBUILD:13
source=("https://more.musl.cc/${pkgver}/x86_64-linux-musl/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz")
llm_review
An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 85%): This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary cross-compiler toolchain (containing gcc, binutils, libc, and other executables) from more.musl.cc, which is a subdomain of the known musl.cc project that distributes prebuilt musl-based toolchains. While musl.cc is a legitimate and well-known resource in the Linux embedded/cross-compilation community, two concerns remain: (1) the checksum is set to 'SKIP', meaning there is zero integrity verification — any MITM or server-side substitution would go undetected; (2) the artifact is a prebuilt binary toolchain that gets installed to /opt/cross and will be executed by users, making integrity verification critical. The host itself (more.musl.cc) is not an official distribution channel like a distro mirror or a major forge, and the lack of any hash means the supply-chain risk is real and unmitigated. This is a genuine medium-severity concern: not clearly malicious, but an executed binary from a semi-official host with no checksum verification.
PKGBUILD
1 offending line(s) highlighted# Maintainer: TheOddCell <rayfb.to.1@gmail.com>
pkgname=musl-cross-bin
pkgver=11.2.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Prebuilt musl cross compiler toolchain (x86_64-linux-musl) from musl.cc"
arch=('x86_64')
url="https://musl.cc"
license=('MIT')
makedepends=('coreutils' 'tar' 'gzip')
depends=()
provides=('musl-cross')
conflicts=()
source=("https://more.musl.cc/${pkgver}/x86_64-linux-musl/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz")
sha256sums=('SKIP')
package() {
install -dm755 "${pkgdir}/opt/cross/x86_64-linux-musl-cross"
tar -xzf "${srcdir}/x86_64-linux-musl-cross.tgz" \
-C "${pkgdir}/opt/cross/"
}
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-01 00:21:48 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-31 00:07:41 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-30 00:29:30 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-29 00:13:55 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-28 00:06:54 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-27 00:23:28 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-26 00:12:40 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-25 00:20:48 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-24 00:14:55 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-23 00:02:19 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-22 00:13:10 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-21 00:12:50 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-20 00:10:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-19 00:03:55 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-18 00:06:55 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-17 00:21:55 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-16 00:12:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-15 00:28:05 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-14 00:06:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-10-13 00:23:45 | Medium | 2 |