nodejs-editly-git
The PKGBUILD installs directly from a live Git branch (git@github.com:mifi/editly.git#master) via npm at package() time, bypassing all AUR source integrity mechanisms (no source array, no checksums, no pkgver pinning). This means: (1) the installed content is whatever is on the master branch at build time — no reproducibility, no integrity verification; (2) npm will also pull in all transitive dependencies from the npm registry at build time without any pinning or checksum verification; (3) using SSH URL (git@github.com) rather than HTTPS is unusual and could fail in many environments, but more importantly it fetches and executes arbitrary remote code. While the upstream repository (mifi/editly) is a legitimate open-source project, the packaging pattern completely bypasses Arch's source integrity model and installs unverified, unpinned, live code. This is a genuine supply-chain concern: a compromise of the upstream repo or any of its npm dependencies would be silently installed. Rated medium rather than high because the upstream is a real, known project and there is no evidence of active malice.
Triggered rules
npm_install_external
Runs `npm/yarn/pnpm install <package>` for a package not in source=(), pulling unpinned, unreviewed code at build time. Severity downgraded: the package declares/looks like a Node.js consumer, where build-time installs are expected.
-
PKGBUILD:19
npm install --user root -g --prefix="${pkgdir}"/usr git@github.com:mifi/editly.git#master
llm_review
An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 85%): The PKGBUILD installs directly from a live Git branch (git@github.com:mifi/editly.git#master) via npm at package() time, bypassing all AUR source integrity mechanisms (no source array, no checksums, no pkgver pinning). This means: (1) the installed content is whatever is on the master branch at build time — no reproducibility, no integrity verification; (2) npm will also pull in all transitive dependencies from the npm registry at build time without any pinning or checksum verification; (3) using SSH URL (git@github.com) rather than HTTPS is unusual and could fail in many environments, but more importantly it fetches and executes arbitrary remote code. While the upstream repository (mifi/editly) is a legitimate open-source project, the packaging pattern completely bypasses Arch's source integrity model and installs unverified, unpinned, live code. This is a genuine supply-chain concern: a compromise of the upstream repo or any of its npm dependencies would be silently installed. Rated medium rather than high because the upstream is a real, known project and there is no evidence of active malice.
PKGBUILD
1 offending line(s) highlighted# Maintainer: soloturn@gmail.com
_npmname=editly
_basename=nodejs-$_npmname
pkgname="$_basename-git"
pkgver=0.11.1_git
pkgrel=0
pkgdesc='create video from a set of clips, images and titles, NLE, non-linear video editing'
arch=('any')
url='https://github.com/mifi/editly'
license=('MIT')
depends=('ffmpeg' 'nodejs')
makedepends=('npm')
options=(!emptydirs)
conflicts=("$_basename")
provides=("$_basename")
package() {
npm install --user root -g --prefix="${pkgdir}"/usr git@github.com:mifi/editly.git#master
install -d -m755 "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}"
ln -s "../../../lib/node_modules/${_npmname}/LICENSE" \
"${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}"
# Clean up
find "${pkgdir}" -name "package.json" -exec sed -e "s|${pkgdir}||g" -e "s|${srcdir}||g" -i {} \; \
-or -name ".*" -type f -exec rm '{}' \; \
-or -name ".*" -type d -prune -exec rm -r '{}' \; \
-or -name "benchmark" -type d -prune -exec rm -r '{}' \; \
-or -name "man" -type d -prune -exec rm -r '{}' \; \
-or -name "test" -type d -prune -exec rm -r '{}' \; \
-or -name "tests" -type d -prune -exec rm -r '{}' \; \
-or ! -type l -perm /022 -exec chmod g-w,o-w '{}' \;
}
# vim:set ts=2 sw=2 et:
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 00:27:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-16 00:03:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-15 00:25:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-14 00:27:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-13 00:19:54 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-12 00:25:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-11 00:19:22 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-10 00:22:44 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-09 00:04:09 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-08 00:18:08 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-07 00:30:15 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-06 00:17:06 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-05 00:16:27 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-04 00:03:13 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-03 00:15:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-02 00:02:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-01 00:11:19 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-31 00:19:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-30 00:04:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-29 00:29:17 | Medium | 2 |