paup-gui

MEDIUM
maintainer malacology 0 votes scanned 2026-09-17 00:27:14.276658
View on AUR
Why flagged

This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt MSI installer from phylosolutions.com (the official upstream vendor site for PAUP, a legitimate phylogenetics software package), so the host itself is not suspicious. However, there are two real concerns: (1) md5sums=('SKIP') means there is no integrity verification whatsoever — any MITM or server compromise would silently deliver a different binary; (2) the package() function runs 'wine msiexec /i ...' which executes the MSI installer interactively during the build phase rather than extracting files to $pkgdir, meaning it installs into the user's Wine prefix rather than the Arch package tree — this is both broken packaging practice and a code-execution concern since an unverified binary is directly executed. The combination of no checksum and direct execution of a downloaded binary from an external host (even a legitimate one) constitutes a real supply-chain risk. The broken packaging pattern (installing to Wine prefix instead of $pkgdir) also means the package cannot be properly tracked or uninstalled by pacman.

Triggered rules

Medium source=() URL on a non-standard host source_untrusted_domain

One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).

  • PKGBUILD:16 source=("http://phylosolutions.com/paup-test/paup4-setup.msi")
Medium AI review llm_review

An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 85%): This PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt MSI installer from phylosolutions.com (the official upstream vendor site for PAUP, a legitimate phylogenetics software package), so the host itself is not suspicious. However, there are two real concerns: (1) md5sums=('SKIP') means there is no integrity verification whatsoever — any MITM or server compromise would silently deliver a different binary; (2) the package() function runs 'wine msiexec /i ...' which executes the MSI installer interactively during the build phase rather than extracting files to $pkgdir, meaning it installs into the user's Wine prefix rather than the Arch package tree — this is both broken packaging practice and a code-execution concern since an unverified binary is directly executed. The combination of no checksum and direct execution of a downloaded binary from an external host (even a legitimate one) constitutes a real supply-chain risk. The broken packaging pattern (installing to Wine prefix instead of $pkgdir) also means the package cannot be properly tracked or uninstalled by pacman.

PKGBUILD

1 offending line(s) highlighted
1# Maintainer: malacology
2# Contributor: malacology
3
4pkgname=paup-gui
5pkgver=4.0a
6pkgrel=1
7pkgdesc="Phylogenetic Analysis Using PAUP"
8arch=('any')
9url="http://phylosolutions.com/paup-test/"
10license=('custom')
11depends=(
12 'wine'
13 'wine_gecko'
14 'wine-mono'
15)
16source=("http://phylosolutions.com/paup-test/paup4-setup.msi")
17md5sums=('SKIP')
18
19package() {
20
21 wine msiexec /i "$srcdir"/paup4-setup.msi
22}
23

Scan history

Scanned at (UTC)SeverityRules
2026-09-17 00:27:14 Medium 2
2026-09-16 00:03:17 Medium 2
2026-09-15 00:25:31 Medium 2
2026-09-14 00:27:57 Medium 2
2026-09-13 00:19:54 Medium 2
2026-09-12 00:25:17 Medium 2
2026-09-11 00:19:22 Medium 2
2026-09-10 00:22:44 Medium 2
2026-09-09 00:04:09 Medium 2
2026-09-08 00:18:08 Medium 2
2026-09-07 00:30:15 Medium 2
2026-09-06 00:17:06 Medium 2
2026-09-05 00:16:27 Medium 2
2026-09-04 00:03:13 Medium 2
2026-09-03 00:15:47 Medium 2
2026-09-02 00:02:31 Medium 2
2026-09-01 00:11:19 Medium 2
2026-08-31 00:19:57 Medium 2
2026-08-30 00:04:14 Medium 2
2026-08-29 00:29:17 Medium 2

Report a package

Reports go to the AURWatch maintainer (one person) and are read by hand. No login required.

0 / 4000
Your suggestion