tic-80-pro
The package builds from the official project's GitHub repository with a SKIP'd checksum, but sources are public and build is transparent; the 'pro' version suggests a modified build of open-source software, not inherently malicious.
Triggered rules
zero_votes_recent
Uploaded within the last 14 days with 2 or fewer community votes — little peer review so far.
llm_review
An AI model (qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507) reviewed this and agrees it is LOW (confidence 95%): The package builds from the official project's GitHub repository with a SKIP'd checksum, but sources are public and build is transparent; the 'pro' version suggests a modified build of open-source software, not inherently malicious.
PKGBUILD
# Maintainer: Retcinder <tulpenkiste at the domain which is amogus dot cloud>
# Based off of tic-80-git, which is not a -git package... Bad naming I think...
pkgname=tic-80-pro
pkgver=1.1.2837
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="TIC-80 is a fantasy computer for making, playing and sharing tiny games. This is the pro version, for those who don't have money to buy it."
arch=('x86_64' 'riscv64' 'aarch64' 'i686' 'riscv32' 'armv7h')
url="https://tic80.com"
license=('MIT')
conflicts=('tic80' 'tic-80')
depends=('libglvnd')
makedepends=('git' 'cmake' 'ruby' 'mesa' 'glu' 'coreutils')
source=("git+https://github.com/nesbox/TIC-80.git#tag=v$pkgver")
sha256sums=('SKIP')
prepare() {
cd "$srcdir/TIC-80"
git submodule update --init --recursive
patch -Np1 -i "$startdir/SDL2.patch"
}
build() {
cd "$srcdir/TIC-80/build"
cmake .. -DBUILD_PRO=On -DBUILD_WITH_ALL=On -DUSE_SYSTEM_SDL2=On -DCMAKE_POLICY_VERSION_MINIMUM=3.5
cmake --build . -j $(nproc)
}
package() {
cd "$srcdir/TIC-80/build"
cmake --install . --prefix "${pkgdir}/usr"
# license
mkdir -p "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname"
install -Dm644 "$srcdir/TIC-80/LICENSE" "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE"
}
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-26 01:28:49 | Low | 2 |