utools
The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from publish.u-tools.cn, which is the official CDN/distribution host for the uTools application (a legitimate Chinese productivity launcher). The domain is operated by the uTools vendor (u.tools). While not a well-known Western forge, this is the vendor's own distribution infrastructure, analogous to how other proprietary apps distribute via their own CDN. A sha512 checksum is present, mitigating substitution attacks at rest, but the checksum only protects against accidental corruption or a one-time swap — it does not protect against the vendor pushing a malicious update (the version is pinned so this is less of a concern). The real concern is that this installs a closed-source, prebuilt binary from a Chinese vendor's CDN directly into /opt, with no source verification beyond the checksum. This is a legitimate supply-chain concern (executed binary from a non-auditable, non-reproducible source), which warrants medium severity, but there is no evidence of active malice, obfuscation, or piracy.
Triggered rules
source_untrusted_domain
One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).
-
PKGBUILD:11
source=("https://publish.u-tools.cn/version2/utools_${pkgver}_amd64.deb")
llm_review
An AI model (anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217) reviewed this and agrees it is MEDIUM (confidence 72%): The PKGBUILD downloads a prebuilt binary .deb from publish.u-tools.cn, which is the official CDN/distribution host for the uTools application (a legitimate Chinese productivity launcher). The domain is operated by the uTools vendor (u.tools). While not a well-known Western forge, this is the vendor's own distribution infrastructure, analogous to how other proprietary apps distribute via their own CDN. A sha512 checksum is present, mitigating substitution attacks at rest, but the checksum only protects against accidental corruption or a one-time swap — it does not protect against the vendor pushing a malicious update (the version is pinned so this is less of a concern). The real concern is that this installs a closed-source, prebuilt binary from a Chinese vendor's CDN directly into /opt, with no source verification beyond the checksum. This is a legitimate supply-chain concern (executed binary from a non-auditable, non-reproducible source), which warrants medium severity, but there is no evidence of active malice, obfuscation, or piracy.
PKGBUILD
1 offending line(s) highlighted# Maintainer: Jack Chen <redchenjs@live.com>
pkgname=utools
pkgver=6.1.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="uTools Utilities"
arch=('x86_64')
url="https://u.tools/"
license=('custom')
depends=('gtk3' 'nss' 'alsa-lib' 'openssl-1.1')
source=("https://publish.u-tools.cn/version2/utools_${pkgver}_amd64.deb")
sha512sums=('509c5abd5ddd96b13105069f04ffca7d4aee0fd04bfbfaa4be507830dd6dc732c2e3f94c4bc5379e36f8b58929220bda56a3448821503b4fd47315619e0ada77')
package() {
tar -xf "$srcdir/data.tar.xz" -C "$pkgdir/"
install -dm755 "$pkgdir/usr/bin"
ln -s /opt/uTools/utools "$pkgdir/usr/bin/utools"
}
Scan history
| Scanned at (UTC) | Severity | Rules |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 00:27:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-16 00:03:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-15 00:25:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-14 00:27:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-13 00:19:54 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-12 00:25:17 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-11 00:19:22 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-10 00:22:44 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-09 00:04:09 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-08 00:18:08 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-07 00:30:15 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-06 00:17:06 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-05 00:16:27 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-04 00:03:13 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-03 00:15:47 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-02 00:02:31 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-09-01 00:11:19 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-31 00:19:57 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-30 00:04:14 | Medium | 2 |
| 2026-08-29 00:29:17 | Medium | 2 |