xotcl

maintainer kolewu · 0 votes · scanned 2026-08-03 00:08:14.047287
LOW
View on AUR ↗
Why flagged The source is a tarball from a university-hosted download domain, which is not whitelisted but plausibly legitimate; it contains the project's own source code, and the build process is standard, posing no active execution or supply-chain risks beyond typical AUR packages.

Triggered rules

LOW AI review downgraded a static finding llm_review

The static rules flagged this MEDIUM, but an AI model (qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-07-25) reviewed the full PKGBUILD and judged it LOW (confidence 95%): The source is a tarball from a university-hosted download domain, which is not whitelisted but plausibly legitimate; it contains the project's own source code, and the build process is standard, posing no active execution or supply-chain risks beyond typical AUR packages.

1 higher static finding superseded - not the current verdict (shown for transparency)
MEDIUM source=() URL on a non-standard host source_untrusted_domain

One or more source=() URLs point to a host outside the trusted allowlist (github.com, gitlab.com, codeberg.org, pypi.org, …).

  • PKGBUILD:12 source=(http://media.wu-wien.ac.at/download/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz

PKGBUILD

1 offending line(s) highlighted
1# Maintainer: Uwe Koloska <kolewu [at] koloro [dot] de>
2
3pkgname=xotcl
4pkgver=1.6.8
5pkgrel=4
6pkgdesc="Extended Object Tcl"
7arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
8url='http://xotcl.org'
9license=('MIT')
10depends=('tk' 'gdbm')
11
12source=(http://media.wu-wien.ac.at/download/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
13 buildpath-tmp.patch)
14md5sums=('82ed6cf1d13f7f3602761f9906b35ea5'
15 'c8f3713b37786dd4420adbfec2e773ef')
16
17build() {
18 cd $pkgname-$pkgver
19
20 patch -i "$srcdir"/buildpath-tmp.patch
21 msg "Starting make..."
22 ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-all --enable-threads
23 msg "make in $(pwd)"
24 make binaries libraries
25 # without an extra make for 'doc' libxotcl1.6.8.so is not ready
26 make doc end
27}
28
29package() {
30 cd $pkgname-$pkgver
31
32 make DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install
33
34 # fix some installation flaws that I will try to sort out later
35 rm -f "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/lib${pkgname}${pkgver}.so"
36 # the symbolic link is only necessary to make namcap happy -- so we leave it out
37 #ln -s ${pkgname}${pkgver}/lib${pkgname}${pkgver}.so "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/"
38 chmod 644 ${pkgdir}/usr/lib/${pkgname}${pkgver}/lib${pkgname}stub${pkgver}.a
39 # there are no manpages installed
40 rm -rf "${pkgdir}/usr/share/man"
41 # and no binaries, too
42 #rm -rf "${pkgdir}/usr/bin"
43
44 install -D -m644 COPYRIGHT "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/LICENSE"
45}
46

Scan history

Scanned at (UTC)SeverityRules
2026-08-03 00:08:14 LOW 2
2026-08-02 00:16:08 LOW 2
2026-08-01 00:11:18 LOW 2
2026-07-31 00:14:10 LOW 2
2026-07-30 00:17:23 LOW 2
2026-07-29 00:25:53 LOW 2
2026-07-28 00:07:28 LOW 2
2026-07-27 00:24:32 LOW 2
2026-07-26 00:07:32 LOW 2
2026-07-25 00:13:44 LOW 2
2026-07-24 00:02:28 LOW 2
2026-07-23 00:14:47 LOW 2
2026-07-22 00:29:32 LOW 2
2026-07-21 00:24:15 LOW 2
2026-07-20 00:19:49 LOW 2
2026-07-19 00:17:08 LOW 2
2026-07-18 00:14:48 LOW 2
2026-07-17 00:06:16 LOW 2
2026-07-16 00:05:41 LOW 2
2026-07-15 00:09:25 LOW 2

Report a package

Reports go to the AURWatch maintainer (one person) and are read by hand. No login required.

0 / 4000
Your suggestion